• cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 hours ago

    What would they use it for? The 2.5 seconds of latency would be too high for most uses. Cooling will be very difficult with no atmosphere. Solar power will be hard since night time lasts two weeks. Radiation will damage electronics unless they bury them.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      No hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, or other types of disasters on the moon. Asteroids are rare enough now that they basically don’t count.

      Latency is high but it doesnt matter for data redundancy.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        Ok… Data redundancy is a possible application… I will tentatively say that’s a feasible goal, if still probably a stupid one.

        I mean, how often do data centers upgrade storage drives? Cause the cost of doing that in space is… unreasonable.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Anything that needs a lot of data. Same reason you’d download something to your PC instead of streaming it.

      Also for local processing before upload. If you have a huge data set that compresses well, it’s much better to compress first, then upload to Earth.